Arnold actually has a pretty good op-ed piece on illegal immigration in the LA Times today. Like always, he walks the middle ground, but at least in this case, I think it’s a good place to be. I applaud him for calling a spade a spade and actually using the word illegal and I applaud him for reminding people that words can be weapons.
But he does write one odd statement that jumped out at me.
It is hypocritical for Congress to condemn people for coming here
illegally when the federal government has been unwilling to do what it
takes to stop them from coming in the first place.
Seriously? It’s hypocritical to condem law-breaking unless you do enough to try to stop the law-breaking in the first place? What if I said if was hypocritical to condemn shoplifters because the store is not doing enough to stop them in the first place? Would anyone actually buy that argument? I know what he’s getting at, that Congress has implicitly said it’s ok to cross the border illegally by not being serious about enforcing current laws, but the way he wrote that makes it sound completely dumb.
But all in all, a pretty good piece from the Governator, I thought. Like anything in an election cycle, rather short of actual proposals, but it’s something, at least.
Go figure. A research at the University of Washington has determined that Ultimate Frisbee is one of the best predictors for academic excellence.
What is this sport that mysteriously divines a university’s stature so precisely? It’s called Ultimate Frisbee, or more commonly just Ultimate. It is the fastest growing college sport and is already played interscholastically at over 500 colleges and universities. While wildly popular on campuses, relatively few in the wider world have even heard of it.
My favorite quote is
Why a game, requiring such all-around athleticism should so consistently be dominated by universities (and presumably students) with off-the-chart academic credentials, is truly a mystery. The top seven schools for ultimate have a mean graduation rate of 95% and nearly as many total Rhodes and Marshal scholars as all of the rest combined. The names speak for themselves: Stanford, Brown, Harvard, Tufts, Dartmouth, Yale, and Princeton.
Where’s MIT? Hey, wait! OK, it’s true, while we had fun playing there, I can’t say we really excelled at a national level, not at least for the men.
Megan seems to be a fun and witty engineer lady up in Sacramento. Plus, she plays Ultimate! At this point, I can’t even remember how I came across her blog, some bread-crumb trail that probably traipsed from Indepundit to Planet KDE to View from Rocky Top. Who knows…
Anyways, I was reading her post about being alpha female. Frankly, I occasionally get frustrated about the same thing, people seeming to need a pointer/mover/shaker/motivator before anything happens. I usually chalk that up to my being an engineer, since the number of other engineers in my circles of friends is rather low. But I never thought about it from a lady’s perspective before.
Megan’s contemplation on dating an alpha guy vs. a beta guy is rather interesting. Perhaps I’m one of those guys who would say that I want to date a lady who is confident and outgoing and well-spoken, etc., etc. but then who ends up scared to actually do that? Hmmm, hardly the case I would want to be true.
From my side, it’s the search for a lady who understand my engineer’s quirks and foibles that eludes me. 😛 It’s non-trivial!
Anyways, it’s a beautiful thing how Megan’s personality seems to ooze through her blog. I’ll have to go through and read more of her posts.